I felt the weight of what I was about to do settle onto my shoulders as Gabriel waited for my response. The consultation on evasion tactics, the strategic advice that would help a criminal organization escape justice, the moral compromise I had been forced into accepting through blackmail and circumstance.

"Relocation should prioritize distance and infrastructure," I began reluctantly, my mind already working through the tactical considerations even as I hated every word coming out of my mouth. "You want to move somewhere that's far enough from São Paulo that casual surveillance becomes resource-intensive, but still has enough urban development that your operations can blend into legitimate economic activity."

Gabriel was listening intently, clearly taking mental notes while maintaining awareness of our surroundings.

"Border regions are tempting but problematic," I continued. "They have the advantage of providing quick escape routes to neighboring countries, but they also attract more law enforcement attention specifically because of that advantage. You're better off—"

Instinct suddenly activated with sharp warnings, while Observation picked up movement patterns in the surrounding forest that didn't match the usual work crew activities.

Soldiers were moving in. Multiple squads from different directions, conducting what appeared to be a coordinated tactical approach toward our position. The movements were too organized and purposeful to be routine patrol adjustments. This is weird...why are there soldiers moving in on us? Did they find out about our deal? No that couldn't be it, they would have demonstrated subtle signs that both me and Evelyn would have noticed.

I stopped mid-sentence, my body language shifting immediately from consultation to alert wariness. Gabriel noticed the change instantly, his own survival instincts honed by years of criminal activity picking up on both my reaction and the subtle sounds of military personnel positioning themselves around us.

"What—" he started to ask, but the question became irrelevant as President Santos emerged from the forest accompanied by at least twenty armed soldiers who had completely surrounded our position.

The soldiers had their weapons raised and trained on Gabriel, though I noticed with some concern that several were also covering me with their aim. Thankfully, I think I was just in the crossfire and I wasn't the real intended target. The tactical positioning suggested they had been planning this operation carefully and weren't taking chances with potential resistance.

"Gabriel de Souza," President Santos said formally, her voice carrying the weight of governmental authority, "you are under arrest for organized criminal activity, illegal trafficking of exotic animals, weapons violations, and numerous other charges under Brazilian law. The two thousand members of your organization currently working on this site are also being apprehended."

The shock on Gabriel's face was genuine and profound. He looked from Santos to me and back again, clearly trying to process how this betrayal had occurred and who was responsible for it.

I felt my own shock mirroring his, though for completely different reasons. This wasn't supposed to happen. We had an agreement, a negotiated deal that provided Gabriel with a grace period to relocate before law enforcement action began. Santos was breaking that arrangement, conducting arrests before the project was even officially complete.

"Why?" I demanded, stepping forward before I could think better of confronting a President surrounded by armed soldiers. "We had a deal with them. A non-aggression pact and a relocation grace period in exchange for their workforce and suspended criminal operations."

Santos turned her attention to me, her expression a mixture of regret and political pragmatism. "We're arresting them now, Reynard. The deal is void."

"You can't just void negotiated agreements," I protested, Persuasive Argumentation beginning to activate as I recognized the need to actually fight for this outcome despite my personal reservations about helping criminals escape. "The entire cooperation was predicated on terms that both parties agreed to follow. Breaking those terms undermines any future negotiations and destroys the credibility necessary for diplomatic solutions."

"The political world is more complicated than idealistic agreements," Santos replied, though her tone suggested she wasn't entirely comfortable with her own position. "Letting known criminals relocate freely when we have them already apprehended would be politically untenable. My opposition would crucify me for allowing gang members to escape justice in exchange for environmental work."

"Then the deal should never have been made in the first place," I countered, my voice rising with frustration. "You don't negotiate terms you have no intention of honoring. That's not complicated politics, that's simple betrayal."

"I did intend to honor it," Santos said, and Lie Detection suggested she was being honest about her original intentions. "But circumstances changed. My political advisors made it clear that following through would be career suicide. I have responsibilities beyond individual agreements."

"Responsibilities like maintaining the credibility that allows future negotiations to function?" I pressed, Persuasive Speaking joining Persuasive Argumentation to create the kind of rhetorical momentum I had used during the United Nations address. "If you arrest them now, you're not just breaking this deal. You're sending a message that Brazil's word means nothing, that agreements with your government can be violated whenever politically convenient. Sure this could work with criminals, but how would other countries react? They could easily use this as a precedent that your word cannot be trusted and that Brazil will take the easy way out when the opportunity presents itself."

I could see recognition in Santos's expression. She had watched me employ these same skills during the UN meeting, had seen how Persuasive Speaking and Persuasive Argumentation could create compelling cases even in hostile political environments. She knew I was using those skills now, and she was torn between the logical force of my arguments and the political pressures she was facing.

"The deal was naive," she said, though her voice carried less certainty than her words. "I shouldn't have agreed to let criminals escape simply because they provided labor for an environmental project."

"The deal was pragmatic," I corrected. "It recognized that sometimes solving larger problems requires uncomfortable cooperation. Breaking it now means we lose credibility for future difficult negotiations when uncomfortable cooperation might be the only viable option."

While we argued, I noticed Gabriel slowly edging away from the center of the confrontation. The soldiers were focused on Santos and me, distracted by the increasingly heated political discussion. Gabriel was using the opportunity to create distance, moving with the kind of careful stealth that had probably kept him alive and free for years of criminal activity.

"Sir!" One of the soldiers suddenly called out, breaking the flow of our argument. "Multiple reports coming in. Several of the apprehended gang members have been freed and escaped. They're scattering into the forest in organized groups."

Santos's expression shifted immediately from political uncertainty to tactical alarm. She turned toward the soldier, clearly preparing to issue orders for pursuit and containment of the escaped criminals.

"Don't," I said sharply, stepping forward to prevent her from giving commands that would escalate the situation further.

"Reynard, they're escaping," Santos said with obvious frustration. "We need to pursue before they disappear into terrain where we'll never find them."

"Give them the grace period we originally promised," I insisted, using Persuasive Argumentation to frame this as the logical conclusion of my previous points. "Let them relocate now, maintain the spirit of our agreement even if the timing has changed. Then you can pursue them without any concern about breaking negotiated terms."

"That's letting criminals escape," Santos protested.

"That's honoring an agreement that our side initiated," I countered. "You negotiated terms with them, used their labor to accomplish environmental goals, and now you're trying to arrest them before they received what was promised. That's using them as unpaid forced labor under false pretenses."

The rhetorical framing clearly hit home. Santos's expression showed that she recognized the ethical implications of what I was describing, even if political considerations made her resistant to accepting those implications.

"And if they hurt people during their escape?" she challenged. "If they commit crimes while 'relocating' to new territory? Am I supposed to just accept that as the cost of maintaining diplomatic credibility?"

"Are you going to be responsible for all the harm caused?" she asked, the question carrying both genuine concern and strategic challenge.

The question hung between us like a physical presence. This was the moment where I could back down, acknowledge that my arguments were based more on my need for Gabriel's information than on genuine ethical principles, and let Santos pursue whatever enforcement strategy she considered politically necessary.

But I needed that informant's contact information. I needed the intelligence that could help identify the World President. And more than that, I had committed to Gabriel through our agreement, had been forced into that commitment through blackmail, and now found myself actually believing the arguments I was making about the importance of maintaining negotiated terms.

"Yes," I said, though I knew I was just saying this to get her to stop issuing pursuit orders. "I'll be responsible for whatever harm results from honoring the grace period we promised them."

If you find any errors ( broken links, non-standard content, etc.. ), Please let us know < report chapter > so we can fix it as soon as possible.